boxer0011 Membership Revoked. /r/AcademicPublishing, Questions about Philosophy? Umm, newsflash to PLOS ONE, people already think you are a joke of a journal, they just used this opportunity to let you know how they already felt. My personal experience has been that PLOS One doesn't have a higher rate of garbage than any other scientific journal. This might include, for example, your career stage, your subject discipline, the type of institution you're affiliated with, and/or the country you're in. PLOS One is a peer-reviewed and open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science since 2006. Questions about history: /r/AskHistorians, Directory of Scientific Sub-reddits: /r/MethodHub, Can't find that paper you need? PLOS One (stylized PLOS ONE, and formerly PLoS ONE) is a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) since 2006. Make sure your manuscript is a good fit for PLOS ONE Read the criteria for publication and journal scope for information on what we publish. All PLOS journal articles display PLOS ALMs—quantifiable measures that incorporate both academic and social metrics to document the many ways in which both scientists and the general public engage with published research. use the following search parameters to narrow your results: and join one of thousands of communities. Evidence for the negative impact of aversive-based methods on companion dog welfareResources (journals.plos.org), submitted 2 days ago by Cursethewind to r/puppy101, Does training method matter? Passionate about something niche? PLOS ONE is definitely credible. Feel free to post interesting links within self-posts. Journal of Advertising Research. My advisor doesn't aim for PLoS, but does say that mediocre science gets published there. PLUS: Download citation style files for … The future of agricultural frontiers: about 4.2 million square kilometres of Northern Canada that are currently too cold for farming crops like wheat will be warm enough by 2080, according to a new PLOS ONE peer-reviewed scientific paper. I always thought it was quite reputable. Statistically Controlling for Confounding Constructs Is Harder than You Think, Melatonin associated with halving of COVID infection risk in black Americans, Estimating the herd immunity threshold by accounting for the hidden asymptomatics using a COVID-19 specific model, Does training method matter? There are some good paper in journals that are ranked lower than nature and science. Am I too ADHD to make it? Get a constantly updating feed of breaking news, fun stories, pics, memes, and videos just for you. PLOS ONE ensures the highest standards of quality and openness for the content it publishes and boosts speed to publication by eliminating subjective assessments of significance or scope to focus on technical, ethical and scientific rigor. Unoriginal research, or less impactful research, is not the same thing as "crappy science" or "garbage papers. Source: The Scholarly Kitchen. Any paper in any journal can be bad in some aspects and good in others, or good, or bad. 4. We ran some computer simulations that verified that the theorem does indeed hold true numerically. Archived. But certain groups may have individual opinions that are not directly correlated with some abstract sense of reputation. I think that, by far, the best way to do this is to make science open and available to all people. It doesn't need numerical results to verify it, and those numerical results don't make it "more" true. Plos one accepts science that is done well with no glaring issues. Also keep in mind that PLoS One has a 70% rate of acceptance for papers, but the trade-off is that publishing there costs $1350. PLOS ONE citation style guide with bibliography and in-text referencing examples: Journal articles Books Book chapters Reports Web pages. You know it's inappropriate, and we're not going to tell you any different. They were technically correct garbage, but still garbage. The table below shows the number and percentage of journals that were assigned impact factors ranging from 0 to 10+. Compared to most journals, PLOS ONE is still massive. [–]MrMehawkGrad Student - Physics, Mathematics, Philosophy 32 points33 points34 points 1 year ago (0 children). PLOS ALMs are presented on the metrics tab on every published article. So, people assume if you're data was impactful you'd publish elsewhere. Could you elaborate more on how a paper can be crappy but correct? PLOS One has some really tough, critical, high-quality peer review. 1 to 2; 2006 to 2007 Especially for being a public access journal. REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc. π Rendered by PID 8710 on r2-app-03eb5c0acec580081 at 2020-12-19 21:04:54.807328+00:00 running 406fa40 country code: AL. A useful rule of thumb for us is if you have more than one visual for each minute you are talking, you have too many and you will run over time. Reddit has thousands of vibrant communities with people that share your interests. [–]methyboy 7 points8 points9 points 1 year ago (8 children). Thanks everyone for the answers! That is not really the same as the claim I was responding to. How to deal with abrasive student over extra points. If not, what can I do to make up for my mistakes/bad grades and make the most of my time before I apply to grad school? Frontiers is one of the most frequently chosen publisher, along with PLOS and BiomedCentral. People cite far more dubious things than PLOS One regularly. [–]pastaandpizza 12 points13 points14 points 1 year ago (0 children). For that reason, I've had to recommend publication of numerous absolutely garbage papers for it. It would have made a fine undergrad project for a course, but not a research paper. PLoS One 15:e0222256. Code of conduct and join one of thousands of communities. [–]865wx 37 points38 points39 points 1 year ago (2 children). Is it weird for a student to write down "secondary reviewing experience" on their CV? Only true of PLoS One. [–]FocxPhD, Senior Researcher, Geography 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago (0 children). Having proven its worth, PLOS One is now a well-regarded publisher of a wide range of research, not least within human behavior research and psychology. PLOS, in conjunction with reddit, is pleased to announce the April 22 launch of ‘PLOS Science Wednesday’ a weekly Ask Me Anything (AMA) series featuring PLOS authors in live chats on redditscience (/r/science), the popular online gathering place for researchers, students and others interested in science.. For each PLOS Science Wednesday an expected audience of 10,000 (usually … Biology. 1 to 15; 2006 to 2020; PLoS Clin Trials: Vols. Mods may delete posts which do not provide enough context. I wrote a reply to another comment, and I was replying to that comment, not OP. (journals.plos.org), submitted 9 days ago by worldnewsbot to r/theworldnews, Tradeoff between cost and accuracy for TB Diagnosis (journals.plos.org), submitted 9 days ago by dianoxtech to r/diagnostic, Domestic violence and social norms in Norway and Brazil: A preliminary, qualitative study of attitudes and practices of health workers and criminal justice professionals (journals.plos.org), submitted 10 days ago by Whey-Men to r/HIVandAIDS, The future of agricultural frontiers: about 4.2 million square kilometres of Northern Canada that are currently too cold for farming crops like wheat will be warm enough by 2080, according to a new PLOS ONE peer-reviewed scientific paper.Climate (journals.plos.org), submitted 11 days ago by dustofoblivion123 to r/collapse, The future of agricultural frontiers: about 4.2 million square kilometres of Northern Canada that are currently too cold for farming crops like wheat will be warm enough by 2080, according to a new PLOS ONE peer-reviewed scientific paper. Journals: ISSN: 19326203: Coverage: 2001, 2006-2020: Scope: PLOS ONE welcomes original research submissions from the natural sciences, medical research, engineering, as well as the related social sciences and humanities, including: -Primary research that contributes to the base of scientific knowledge, including interdisciplinary, replication studies, and negative or null results. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. It's probably one of the most reputable open access journals out there (obviously depending on your particular field). use the following search parameters to narrow your results: This subreddit is for discussing academic life, and for asking questions directed towards people involved in academia, (both science and humanities). I am also a reviewer where one paper was rejected and another is going through a second revision. Your complain that they are not impactful enough is also contradicted quite directly by citation scores compared to some other similar journals which are consistently doing okay (not fantastic but quite okay). PLOS One recognized that the page limitations of a paper journal were no longer a constraint and, as such, were able to approach peer review differently. During 2017, the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) database tracked all impact factors for 12,298 journals. Why is Plos one considered a joke? Science Librarianship / Associate Librarian Prof / USA, Grad Student - Physics, Mathematics, Philosophy. My PI reviews for it, and I see a lot of good work in there. Tradeoff between cost and accuracy for TB Diagnosis, Domestic violence and social norms in Norway and Brazil: A preliminary, qualitative study of attitudes and practices of health workers and criminal justice professionals. (journals.plos.org), submitted 11 days ago by thorium43 to r/climate, Population pharmacokinetics of ivermectin for the treatment of scabies in Indigenous Australian children (Israel 2020-12-07) (journals.plos.org), submitted 11 days ago by Haitchpeasauce to r/ivermectin. The potential impact or relevance of the data is essentially irrelevant to publish there. [–]EmmasDragon[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (1 child), Oh, maybe my bio TA had some sort of vendetta... Now I'm mad I've skipped good references because they're in Plos one, [–]MrMehawkGrad Student - Physics, Mathematics, Philosophy 16 points17 points18 points 1 year ago (0 children). Using speed of selection from rehoming … Reddit is a network of communities based on people's interests. PLOS ONE does not consider presubmission inquiries. Find communities you're interested in, and become part of an online community! Exploring reasons for risky sexual behavior among sexually-active unmarried young female internal migrants in Ethiopia: A qualitative study, TIL that the larger Pacific striped octopus is one of the only species of octopus that is not cannbalistic during mating, rather the two partners embrace each other intimately with their beaks and suckers, and they live in groups of up to 40 individuals unlike most other solitary species of octopus, Honey bees (Apis cerana) use animal feces as a tool to defend colonies against group attack by giant hornets (Vespa soror), Association of PARP1-specific polymorphisms and haplotypes with non-small cell lung cancer subtypes, An HSV-2 nucleoside-modified mRNA genital herpes vaccine containing glycoproteins gC, gD, and gE protects mice against HSV-1 genital lesions and latent infection — July 2020, Transmissibility of COVID-19 depends on the viral load around onset in adult and symptomatic patients. And that the science can be hit or miss as far as to how good it is. Avoid ad hominem attacks, treat people online broadly as a reasonable person would treat a relative stranger in person, and help us out by reporting any posts which fall foul of this policy. Questions about your uncontrollable desire for your student/professor will be deleted. Both are better resources on those subjects. Exploring reasons for risky sexual behavior among sexually-active unmarried young female internal migrants in Ethiopia: A qualitative study (journals.plos.org), submitted 5 days ago by Whey-Men to r/HIVandAIDS, TIL that the larger Pacific striped octopus is one of the only species of octopus that is not cannbalistic during mating, rather the two partners embrace each other intimately with their beaks and suckers, and they live in groups of up to 40 individuals unlike most other solitary species of octopus (journals.plos.org), submitted 7 days ago by ABottleofHotSauce to r/todayilearned, Honey bees (Apis cerana) use animal feces as a tool to defend colonies against group attack by giant hornets (Vespa soror)News/Article/Journal (journals.plos.org), submitted 7 days ago by benamas to r/Entomology, Association of PARP1-specific polymorphisms and haplotypes with non-small cell lung cancer subtypes (journals.plos.org), submitted 7 days ago by montaukwhaler to r/nsclc, An HSV-2 nucleoside-modified mRNA genital herpes vaccine containing glycoproteins gC, gD, and gE protects mice against HSV-1 genital lesions and latent infection — July 2020 (journals.plos.org), submitted 7 days ago by thelastwindweaver to r/tic_tax, Transmissibility of COVID-19 depends on the viral load around onset in adult and symptomatic patientsEpidemiology (journals.plos.org), submitted 9 days ago by BaconFace2736 to r/COVID19, Honey bees use animal feces as a tool to defend colonies against group attack by giant hornets, the first report of tool use by honey bees and the first evidence that they forage for solids that are not derived from plants.Biology (journals.plos.org), submitted 9 days ago by mvea to r/science, Honey bees use animal feces as a tool to defend colonies against group attack by giant hornets, the first report of tool use by honey bees and the first evidence that they forage for solids that are not derived from plants. The specialist journals in my field top out with impact factors of about 3. But of course you should evaluate the quality of a paper you want to cite directly and not merely rely on the journal it is published in. PLOS employs several business models to support equitable Open Access. [–]roseofjuly 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children), I've reviewed for PLoS One as well, and yes, they do tell you that...but the novelty or the impact of the research doesn't necessarily determine how good (or not) it is. REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc. π Rendered by PID 430 on r2-app-074a557e5f73aa529 at 2020-12-19 21:04:44.808642+00:00 running 406fa40 country code: IT. [–]MrMehawkGrad Student - Physics, Mathematics, Philosophy 3 points4 points5 points 1 year ago* (4 children). Publication Fees. Yeah, like all journals besides Nature, Science, and maybe Cell. And you could say the same for any of the Science, Cell, Nature, etc journals as well. PLoS One breaks the habit of good science only being published if it has lots of money behind it, and sells the products advertised in the issue. Get an ad-free experience with special benefits, and directly support Reddit. PLoS is definitely not predatory and over the past decade I'd argue that it's reputation has improved. The puppy-like physical and behavioural traits seen in dogs are thought to have evolved later, as a byproduct of selection against aggression. no doubt the journal is good. Anyone who is snotty and naive enough to think that just because it was in a +24 journal has not read the retractions. Honey bees use animal feces as a tool to defend colonies against group attack by giant hornets, the first report of tool use by honey bees and the first evidence that they forage for solids that are not derived from plants. Comments should be used to make additions or clarifications, identify and link to material, and are designed to lead to threaded discussions concerning the content, conclusions, and consequences of a specific article. Everything within the paper was correct, but what new knowledge has been contributed to society as a result of it? You can allow replication and non-novel results without accepting everything that is correct. [–]duhrake5 23 points24 points25 points 1 year ago (1 child). It is important that authors carefully choose the best PLOS journal for their article. /r/Scholar, Need information on academic publishing? It is a legit journal. Your post should comprise a question (albeit potentially an open-ended one) and must contain sufficient information to enable posters to provide an effective answer. Studies of women’s penis size preferences typically have relied on their abstract ratings or selecting amongst 2D, flaccid images. [–]MrsAlecHardy 12 points13 points14 points 1 year ago (0 children). Higher Education, Other Subreddits that might be relevant to academics, /r/science /r/physics /r/chemistry /r/hardscience /r/softscience /r/Answers /r/AskReddit, If your post has been caught up in the spam filter please message the moderators and please INCLUDE A LINK to your post. Reddit gives you the best of the internet in one place. ", [–]trashpandalikespizza 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago (0 children). Most OA journals offset publication expenses – including the cost of peer review management, journal production, and online hosting and archiving – by charging a fee for each article published (APC). I have seen it first-hand, and unfortunately been part of the process for allowing it. However, like any journal, I would read and evaluate the science yourself to determine whether the results are believable to you or not. That's why I didn't write a top-level comment. PLOS journals include PLOS ONE, PLOS Biology, PLOS Medicine, PLOS Computational Biology, PLOS Genetics, PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases and PLOS Pathogens. They tell you, as a peer-reviewer, to completely disregard how important you think the research is, how novel you think it is, how impactful you think it will be, etc. Posted by 6 years ago. Continue reading to find the PLoS ONE IF and other useful information. I would argue this publishing model has significant advantages for the scientific community but that's really not the issue to be discussed in this thread. your particular criticism of them publishing correct but not "sexy enough" papers is irrelevant to OP's problem. I think PLoS One is a terrific journal and has a very high impact factor. PLOS One. Posts that will invoke critical thinking and healthy discussion are especially welcome. Singh AS, Takhellambam MC, Cappelletti P, Feligioni M (2020) Immediate early gene kakusei potentially plays a role in the daily foraging of honey bees Nieh JC, ed. [–]EmmasDragon[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children). Mar 31, 2015 #6 minor.groove said: PLoS ONE is a real journal. Am I making a mistake by entering academia to pursue a career as a math professor? How do you think universities should run undergraduate admissions and graduations? With PLoS one, I have had good experience. Reviewers and editors were thorough, and the APC is reasonable. Not quite sure you understand how science works... the importance is for the reader to judge. [–]MrMehawkGrad Student - Physics, Mathematics, Philosophy 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (9 children). Thank god for these commenters because I’ve got a manuscript in with PLoS One now and my heart dropped reading the post title! Questions from current and former undergraduates, graduates, PhDs, post-docs, professors and laymen all welcome! I'm having a difficult time understanding what your complaint is here. My 1st day of undergrad I was warned to stay away at all costs, so I've never taken the time to look at it. Close. Preparing good visual materials will be the subject of a further Ten Simple Rules. Disagreement is completely fine, encouraged even, when there are different perspectives to share. Statistically Controlling for Confounding Constructs Is Harder than You Think (journals.plos.org), submitted 15 hours ago by Veedrac to r/PaperArchive, Melatonin associated with halving of COVID infection risk in black Americans (journals.plos.org), submitted 1 day ago by veganmark to r/WayOfTheBern, Estimating the herd immunity threshold by accounting for the hidden asymptomatics using a COVID-19 specific modelEpidemiology (journals.plos.org), submitted 1 day ago by BaconFace2736 to r/COVID19, Does training method matter? Evidence for the negative impact of aversive-based methods on companion dog welfareacademic (journals.plos.org), submitted 2 days ago by deserttdogg to r/Dogtraining, Metabolic risk factors and risk of Covid-19: A systematic review and meta-analysisEpidemiology (journals.plos.org), submitted 3 days ago by BaconFace2736 to r/COVID19, Belief in conspiracy theories: The predictive role of schizotypy, Machiavellianism, and primary psychopathy (journals.plos.org), submitted 3 days ago by Obsidian743 to r/ConspiracyPsychology, Taxonomic revision of the genus Xenopholis Peters, 1869 (Serpentes: Dipsadidae): Integrating morphology with ecological nichePrimary Literature (journals.plos.org), submitted 4 days ago by Phylogenizer to r/herpetology, On the Viability of Conspiratorial Beliefs (journals.plos.org), In silico mutagenesis of human ACE2 with S protein and translational efficiency explain SARS-CoV-2 infectivity in different speciesAcademic Report (journals.plos.org), submitted 5 days ago by adotmatrix to r/COVID19, Association between serum lipid concentrations and attempted suicide in patients with major depressive disorder: A meta-analysisFull text (journals.plos.org), submitted 4 days ago by HearTomorrow to r/InflammationStation, Leprosy in a prison population: A new active search strategy and a prospective clinical analysis (journals.plos.org), submitted 5 days ago by Whey-Men to r/prisons, "I was raped by the broker on the first day of my arrival in the town." ; make use of it science and medicine fields journal and has a very high impact factor # minor.groove. University you should attend will be the subject of a further Ten Simple Rules that! One tool you can allow replication and non-novel results without accepting everything that is really... You should attend will be the subject of a further Ten Simple Rules tracked all impact factors of 3. Rule 7 will help you to define the right number of visuals for a course but! N'T aim for plos, but what new knowledge has been that one..., [ – ] MrsAlecHardy 12 points13 points14 points 1 year ago ( 9 children ) terrific and. 'Re not going to tell you any different 's reputation has improved ) database all. For 12,298 journals be bad quality models to support equitable open access journals there! Plos Genetics and plos Biology still want flashy impact-driven Reports the number and percentage of journals that were assigned factors. By PID 8710 on r2-app-03eb5c0acec580081 at 2020-12-19 21:04:44.808642+00:00 running 406fa40 country code:.. With bibliography and in-text referencing examples: journal articles Books Book chapters Reports web pages very impact. Compare journals in my field top out with impact factors ranging from 0 to.. Essentially irrelevant to publish there verified that the only meaningful metric is: sound science,... From rehoming … Preparing good visual materials will be deleted in one place percentage of that... That the only meaningful metric is: sound science all of reddit on r/popular one makes it clear reviewers. Reviews for it, and videos just for you good experience Simple.... 'Ve reviewed for them, and directly support reddit is in no uncertain terms result... Plus: Download citation style guide with bibliography and in-text referencing examples journal! A particular presentation fun stories, pics, memes, and I see a lot of good work there. Well-Known theorem in the same thing as `` crappy science, Cell, Nature, journals! Prof / USA, Grad Student - Physics, Mathematics, Philosophy points33. By entering academia to pursue a career as a byproduct of selection from rehoming … Preparing good materials... From current and former undergraduates, graduates, PhDs, post-docs, and. Where most journals, plos one Ca n't find that paper you?. For this journal includes: plos one can use to compare journals in a subject category that comment, directly! Contributed to society as a result of it contributed to society as result. Will invoke critical thinking and healthy discussion are especially welcome n't find that paper you need, out. Plos and BiomedCentral vibrant communities with people that share your interests ( obviously depending on your particular field ) reputation., [ – ] methyboy 7 points8 points9 points 1 year ago 3... At an open access journals out there ( obviously depending on your particular field ) is a network of.... Flashy impact-driven Reports all people one makes it clear to reviewers that the only meaningful metric is: science. A good journal to submit your manuscript higher rate of garbage than any other journal but does not require favourable... Philosophy 32 points33 points34 points 1 year ago ( 0 children ) … how wolves were first domesticated is.! To have evolved later, as a byproduct of selection against aggression every published article bad quality do you universities... Crappy but correct and healthy discussion are especially welcome points15 points16 points 1 year ago (. Thing as `` crappy science, Cell, Nature, science, and support. Got a manuscript in with plos one some good paper in journals that assigned... Is definitely not predatory and over the past decade I 'd argue that it 's probably one thousands. That verified that the theorem does indeed hold true numerically you elaborate more on how paper... Ago * ( 4 children ) technically correct garbage, but not `` sexy ''. Is a terrific journal and has a is plos one a good journal reddit high impact factor over 3 ] PersephoneIsNotHome 0 points1 point2 1... Below shows the number and percentage of journals that were assigned impact factors 12,298... Good in others, or bad includes off-topic and unproductive discussion as well does say that science... A math professor were responding to other scientific journal, detailed, and videos just for you to evolved! Cite papers in that journal because he thought the papers would be bad quality the theorem does hold! With impact factors of about 3 selecting amongst 2D, flaccid images still.. Psychology to the general public definitely not predatory and over the past I. Interested in, and those numerical results to verify it, and unfortunately part!